Tag Archives: NFL

The Hidden Dangers for Black Coaches Within the NFL’s Rooney Rule Alteration

During the modern Civil Rights Era, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. warned that changes to the Law were easy for American legislators; however, the application would be difficult. In his legendary style, Dr. King stated that integration of a public park is easy. According to Dr. King, the most difficult portion of this integration process was the integration of the employment sector and American schools that Whites have always dominated. The sharing of a swing set by Black and White children would look like child’s play when compared to the business sector. For verification of Dr. King’s cryptic prophecy, one needs to look no further than the current conundrum facing National Football League leaders seeking to diversify their head coaching ranks.    

Now, the National Football League, a sports league that primarily rests on the physical prowess of Black men, continues the arduous task of injecting color into its lily-White ownership ranks and head coaching group except for a paltry few. Presently there are only five “minority” head coaches in the NFL and not a single Black majority owner. Representative of the prolonged nature of this problem is the Rooney Rule, named in honor of former Pittsburgh Steelers owner Dan Rooney, who headed the league’s diversity committee.  

The Rooney Rule, implemented in 2003, requires NFL franchises with a head coaching vacancy to interview at least one “minority candidate” during the hiring process. It is not a stretch to compare the NFL’s initial efforts to diversify its head coaching ranks to manifestations of the NFL’s version of 70’s Affirmative Action as it is not a quota mandating the hiring of a minority to the head coaching position. The Rooney Rule has met with limited success as White owners have continued to resist handing over the reins of their organizations to a Black man. 

Most agree that the securing of a coordinator’s position is a stepping stone to becoming an NFL Head Coach. With the NFL becoming a more offensive-oriented league, it makes some sense that there has been a run of Offensive Coordinators ascending to Head Coaching posts. The latest alteration of the Rooney Rule mandates that all NFL teams must hire a minority offensive assistant coach for the upcoming 2022 season.  

On the surface, this is a positive development for Black NFL coaches. However, this alteration to league hiring policies includes a disturbing aspect. The disconcerting portion of this alteration revolves around the following language.  

The hired coach can be “a female or a member of an ethnic or racial minority.” 

Such language reminds me of the expansion of 70’s Affirmative Action initiatives that were initially aimed at leveling the playing field so that Black coaches could at least get in the competition. Let us make no mistake about it, Affirmative Action initiatives were tantamount to reparations for Black people who had been discriminated against via multi-faceted state-sanctioned discrimination schemes that traversed across politics, economics, education, and every other measurable aspect of American society. Yet, in time, the umbrella of government programs aimed at repairing an injury that began when the first parcel of stolen Africans arrived in Jamestown with a status of “half-free” hanging around their necks was expanded to include other “minority groups” such as White women.  

Black political leaders failed the Race when they proved either unwilling to fight for or incapable of defending what should have been considered sacred ground as it was carved out by the blood, sweat, tears, and sacrifices of millions of deceased persons of African descent.  

The new language that adds women at all levels of the Rooney Rule means that women and/or people of color can satisfy the requirement to interview two external minorities for top positions, including head coach. It is now possible for any NFL Franchise to meet the standard created by the Rooney Rule without interviewing a Black coach; they only need to interview two White women. 

Although I care little if anyone considers this post an articulation of misogyny because such shallow analysis is not worthy of even a short response. My position has nothing to do with the shutting out of White women from the NFL coaching ranks, I suspect that in time there will be more White female Offensive Coordinators and Head Football Coaches at the highest level of football if for no other reason than the comfortability of White owners with other Whites, regardless of their socioeconomic status.  

I am firmly entrenched in the belief that the Rooney Rule was created to facilitate a path to Head Coaching posts for Blacks who make up most of the gridiron gladiators that this nation cheers for on many Sundays. The decision to expand who fits under an overcrowded minority umbrella matters mightily because only a few, and I do mean a few, will ever be permitted to lead an NFL franchise. Over time, I am sure that the alluded alteration to the Rooney Rule will serve to create more competition for Offensive Coordinator positions as teams will seek to be the first to promote White women to such a position and as mentioned above this is a stepping stone to being a head coach.  

It is truly unfortunate that in a league that is overwhelmingly Black that few are willing to publicly articulate the fact that the path to an increase in Black head coaches was problematized with this alteration and more than likely will never be paved over until there are a substantial number of Black owners in the league.  

This is the world that we live in. 

 James Thomas Jones III, Ph.D. 

©Manhood, Race, and Culture, 2022 

Please remember to subscribe to the Manhood, Race, and Culture YouTube Channel. 

You can always contact me at ManhoodRaceCulture@gmail.com with ideas and issues that you would like to have addressed. 

I would love to hear from you. 

Exhibit 284: Why Athletic Prowess Does Not Prepare A Person to be a Political Commentator (The Case of Sir Charles Barkley)

It is a joy to watch what W.E.B. Du Bois characterized as the dawning of racial consciousness among my students. Now, I am not saying that it is not until my students enter my class that they become aware of race or racial identity. Such an assertion would be foolish. For many of my students, Introduction to African-American Studies is the first time they have seriously considered race, class, activism, and identity.

During a recent discussion, one of my brilliant students opened the conversation with an interesting quip.

I wonder what things would be like today if we still had leaders like we used to.

I responded in the following manner.

Well, you do have Lebron James commenting on these matters.

A phalanx of students erupted in unison with an overwhelming

C’mon, Dr. Jones. Lebron? Who is he to be our leader?

Of course, my rebuttal regarding the absence of suitable leadership for Black America was a facetious quip intended to provoke thought within my young charges.

It would be an understatement to say that I was incredibly proud of my students for raising the pressing issue of what a Black leader should be and ought to do. Are there qualifications to become a spokesperson for Black America? Or is it something that you are anointed by some unidentified source to do?

It appears that there is a correlation found between fame and the rise of Black leaders. Unfortunately for Blacks, the alluded to fame flows from God-given abilities, not study. One needs to look no further than the personas that appear on national newscasts to discuss critical racial matters that take decades of study to comprehend. One’s ability to sing, jump, run, or dunk a ball through a metal hoop has nothing to do with one’s ability to issue productive commentary regarding this nation’s centuries-long racial problems.

This issue of athletes and entertainers serving as spokespersons for the race is nothing new. History dictates that the most reliable path to being a nationally known expert on race is to record a song about possessing a “Wet Ass Pussy” or becoming a notable professional athlete.

It is the history mentioned above that fed my non-response to Charles Barkley’s emergence as a political commentator some years ago. Yes, the same Charles Barkley, who reminded us in a long-forgotten 1993 commercial that he was not a role model.

I am not a role model. I’m not paid to be a role model. I’m paid to wreak havoc on the basketball court. Parents should be role models. Just because I dunk a basketball doesn’t mean I should raise your kids.

My how things have changed; during the past twenty-five years, we have witnessed sports figures such as Charles Barkley reverse the downplaying of their importance regarding matters that occur beyond the playing-field to pursuing every opportunity to comment on critical political issues. If I did not know any better, somebody could convince me that the path to being a political commentator or cultural critic was notoriety as a professional athlete.

In the wake of the Grand Jury verdict that exonerated Jonathan Mattingly, Brett Hankison, and Myles Cosgrove for their actions during a no-knock raid of Breonna Taylor’s dwelling, Sir Charles Barkley opined the following in front of millions of viewers.

I don’t think this one was like George Floyd or Ahmaud Arbery and things like that. I feel sad that this young lady lost her life…But I am worried to lump all these situations in together.

And I just feel bad that the young lady lost her life. But we do have to take into account that her boyfriend shot at the cops and shot a cop. So, like I say, even though I am really sorry she lost her life, I just don’t think we can put this in the same situation as George Floyd or Ahmaud Arbery.

After hearing Barkley’s commentary, I marveled at how he managed to be so comprehensively wrong. The answer to how he managed this feat is simple, Charles Barkley, much like his athletic peers, has neither qualification nor the abilities to address such pressing matters.

Barkley’s dim-witted assertion that the murder of Breonna Taylor was different from the deaths of George Floyd and Ahmaud Arbery would be laughable if it were not heard by so many around the globe. Make no mistake about it, the insistence of brilliant Black writers such as Toni Morrison and Maya Angelou that words are powerful entities is a lesson that is largely lost on the recent crop of Black political pundits and culture critics who have been booked for appearances by media outlets such as ESPN, Fox, MSNBC, and CNN. Their absence of understanding and ability to form a persuasive argument is a missed opportunity that retards Black advancement.

These unfortunate developments remind me of esteemed historian Dr. John Henrik Clarke’s words. Clarke asserted that outsiders had taken over the Black movement with little genuine interest in Black liberation. According to Dr. Clarke, we now have Hollywood revolutions that are akin to the lights, camera, and action moments commonly found on a blockbuster movie set.

I guess that the Last Poet’s prophecy that “the revolution will not be televised” is proving correct. One needs to look no further than the set of “Inside the NBA” and listen to the commentary of Charles Barkley for confirmation that there is always some Black fool willing to receive a King’s ransom from working against Black interests by talking loud and saying absolutely nothing.

Dr. James Thomas Jones III

© Manhood, Race, and Culture, 2020.